A City Half in Ruins...
(www.RemnantNewspaper.com)
There has been much speculation
about the contents of the still hidden Third Secret of
Fatima. Our Lady commanded by express order that the
Secret be released in 1960. When Cardinal Ottaviani in
1955 asked Sister Lucia “Why this date?” she said the
meaning of the Secret will “seem clearer” (“mais
claro”) at that time. Of course, the most impactful
event for the Church at that time was the ensuing Second
Vatican Council (1962-1965), and many clerics who have
read or know the Secret explain that it prophesies an
apostasy in the Church as a result of the council’s
novelties.
Sister Lucia confirmed that the
Third Secret begins with Our Lady’s mysterious phrase,
“In Portugal, the dogma of the faith will always be
preserved etc…,” implying that the Faith will not be
preserved elsewhere, even at the highest levels of the
Church.
But are Vatican II and the New Mass
the only warnings of the Third Secret? No. In 2000, the
Vatican revealed that in the third part of the Secret
Our Lady prophesies a possible execution of a Pope,
along with bishops, priests, religious and laity in a
city half in ruins, perhaps devastated by a nuclear
attack. Our Lady in the second part of the Secret also
accurately predicted World War II. Hence, the Great
Secret of Fatima reveals terrifying material, not just
spiritual, chastisements. But how might additional,
yet-to-be revealed material chastisements of the Third
Secret be connected to 1960? Especially when the
conditional prophesies of the execution of a Pope and
the devastation of a city have not yet occurred as of
2013?
My research has led me to a
frightening though plausible conclusion: Beginning in
1960, Russia and the United States became formally
aware of the biggest material threat to modern
civilization.
That threat is referred to as an
electromagnetic pulse attack (EMP). An EMP is created by
the detonation of a nuclear bomb over a geographical
area which damages or destroys all of the electronic
systems within the targeted area. In 1960, both the
Soviet Union and the United States formalized plans to
test nuclear weapons that would be able to bring about a
paralyzing EMP against their enemies. These tests would reveal the
potential damage of an EMP which far surpassed
scientific expectations.
In 1961 and 1962, the Soviet Union
launched a series of nuclear bombs over a large
geographical area in Kazakhstan whose infrastructure was
heavily electrified. The series of test launches was
known as K-3 or Test 184. Reports were later issued which
revealed that the civilian infrastructure of Kazakhstan
was severely damaged. Major underground power lines
failed, diesel generators malfunctioned, radar was
disabled and telephone lines were shut down. All
overvoltage protectors fired, and all of the fuses on
the power line were blown. Even with the usage of relatively
smaller nuclear bombs in these tests, debilitating
damage was achieved.
On July 9, 1962, the United States
also performed an EMP test known as “Starfish Prime” by
launching a high-altitude nuclear bomb over Johnston
Island in the mid-Pacific Ocean.
It was discovered that electromagnetic fields were
adversely affected in Honolulu, Hawaii almost 900 miles
away. Streetlights were extinguished, microwave
communications were disrupted and burglar alarms were
sounded off. A number of orbiting satellites were also
destroyed. While these effects were not overly dramatic,
the test burst was very distant from Hawaii and electronic technology has
become much more sensitive to EMP since 1962. Moreover, the thermonuclear
warhead (so-called “hydrogen bomb”) used in Starfish was
very inefficient at producing EMP. Nevertheless, the
effects of the blast surprised the experts and confirmed
that our critical infrastructures, including the
electrical power grid itself, would be subject to
incalculable damage in an effective EMP attack.
In other words, the potential damage of an EMP attack
became “clearer” with these nuclear tests beginning in
1960 – the year Our Lady commanded the Third Secret to
be revealed.
Because almost all aspects of modern
American life are run by electricity, primarily through
computer chips (food storage, water distribution,
utilities, transportation, communication, financial
services), the United States is extremely vulnerable to
this type of attack. This vulnerability has increased
significantly over the last 40 years as more and more of
our infrastructure has become increasingly dependent
upon electronics. Moreover, based on Congressional
reports, we are currently defenseless in most aspects
against such warfare. The United States Congress formed a
Commission in 2001 to examine the impact of EMP on our
country, with particular focus on the Soviet and
American testing of 1962. The Commission concluded:
Several
potential adversaries have or can acquire the capability
to attack the United States with a high-altitude nuclear
weapon-generated electromagnetic pulse (EMP). A
determined adversary can achieve an EMP attack
capability without having a high level of
sophistication. EMP is one of a small number of threats
that can hold our society at risk of catastrophic
consequences. EMP will cover the wide geographic region
within line of sight to the nuclear weapon. It has the
capability to produce significant damage to critical
infrastructures and thus to the very fabric of US
society, as well as to the ability of the United States
and Western nations to project influence and military
power.”
Within seconds of a full-blown EMP
attack against our country, millions of Americans would
die instantly – in planes that would fall from the sky,
in cars that would malfunction, and in hospitals whose
life-supporting systems would shut down. The rest who are not prepared for
such an attack would eventually die either of starvation
or disease, or at the hands of hunger-crazed citizens or
enemy invaders. The effects would be more immediate
in populated areas, with survivors frantically
attempting to escape to the country in search of food
and protection. Information sharing would cease as
nearly all radio and television programs would go off
the air, further paralyzing our nation with fear of the
unknown. Financial systems would shut down and American
currency would become worthless. Our country would sink
into physical and spiritual darkness beyond all
imagination and comprehension.
Within hours of a successful attack,
city riots would precipitate and stores would be looted
for food before it rotted. Killers and rapists would escape
from prisons and rain terror upon their victims. After
only a month or two, there would be a proliferation of
infectious disease, mass-murder and suicide, and
starving people would resort to cannibalism, some even
eating their own children. If the attack occurred in the
winter, millions would also freeze to death. Under any
scenario, our military would be paralyzed, as
electronically governed aircraft, tanks, submarines and
weaponry would no longer function and communications
would almost completely break down.
We would be unable to successfully defend against
the inevitable foreign invasion. It would be a literal
hell on Earth. It is the most horrific and terrifying
scenario that could ever be conceived by the human mind.
As Pope John Paul I said, “The secret; it’s terrible.” And it could be the conditional
chastisement revealed by Our Lady in the Third Secret of
Fatima – a chastisement that could befall us if the Pope
does not consecrate Russia in time.
If this is the Secret, it must be
the reason why Sister Lucia could not initially write it
down, even after having been commanded to do so by her
bishop. What could possibly have scared Lucia in such a
manner? After all, she had seen a vision of hell and had
been threatened with torture and death as a child.
Surely, Our Lady’s description of the aftermath of an
EMP attack could have done so. This may also be why
Malachi Martin revealed on the Art Bell Show in
1997 that the Third Secret is more shocking than people
can imagine. After revealing the Secret is “much worse”
than a natural disaster, he said it “would give a shock,
would terrify people, would fill confessionals on
Saturday night, would fill the cathedrals, the
basilicas, and the churches with believers on their
knees, beating their breasts.” People do not react that way for
warnings of apostasy, especially when these warnings are
in Scripture and most of the world is already apostate.
But such a reaction is not only conceivable, but
expected from those faithful who believe their lives
could suddenly be transformed into incomprehensible
terror, knowing their fate is in the hands of one man,
the Pope (with whom they must now publicly plead to be
spared through the consecration).
We are also reminded that Our Lady
repeated the warnings of the Third Secret in Her
apparitions at Akita, Japan in 1973. In 1998, Howard
Dee, the former Philippine Ambassador to the Vatican
revealed to Inside the Vatican that “Cardinal
Ratzinger personally confirmed to me that these two
messages, of Fatima and Akita, are essentially the
same.”
At Akita, Our Lady warned of “a
terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a
punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will
have never seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and
will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well
as the bad.”
In an EMP attack, fire does indeed fall from the
sky through the nuclear explosion that creates the
damaging current of positive ions, resulting in the
eventual indiscriminate loss of life in its wake. At
Akita, Our Lady also revealed, “The survivors will envy
the dead.” This would be the case if survivors were
imprisoned in a world of physical and mental torture
with no way to escape – the inevitable consequence of an
EMP attack. This could be why Cardinal Ratzinger, in his
1984 interview with Vittorio Messori, stated that Fatima
reveals “dangers threatening the faith and life
of the Christian, and therefore of the world.” In his May 13, 1967 sermon at
Fatima, Paul VI also warned that “the world is in
danger.”
This may also be why the Popes have
chosen not to release the Third Secret. In their minds,
revealing it would risk precipitating the prophesied
events. For example, when John Paul II in Fulda, Germany
(1981) was asked why the Secret was not released, he
replied: “Given the seriousness of the contents, my
predecessors in the Petrine office diplomatically
preferred to postpone publication so as to not encourage
the world power of Communism to make certain moves.”
Cardinal Ottaviani had similarly
stated in 1967 that the Secret was not revealed in order
“To avoid that something so delicate, not destined for
public consumption, come for whatever reason, even
fortuitous, to fall into alien hands.” When Messori in his 1984 interview
with Ratzinger pressed him by concluding “I venture, it
seems that here [in the Third Secret], also as in the
two other ‘secrets,’ Russia is mentioned?” the Cardinal
refused to go further and discuss any of the details.
These statements indicate the Third
Secret may reveal a devastating attack by Russia against
the West, which could most easily be achieved through
EMP warfare. This information is indeed “delicate” and
extremely dangerous in “alien hands,” because it would
publicly reveal the outcome of Russia’s successful
military strategy against the U.S., which it sought to
confirm during its EMP testing in 1961-1962. Note well
that it takes only a single scud missile, at a cost of
only $100,000, with a single nuclear warhead, launched
from an inexpensive base or shipboard in international
waters, and detonated at 250 miles over the central U.S.
to fatally cripple our nation. This is also why such an
attack could easily come from the less sophisticated,
rogue nations of the Middle East, who are under the
direction and control of “the world power of Communism.”
The Blessed Elena Aiello prophesied,
in 1960 of all years, that “another terrible war will
come from the East to the West. Russia with her secret
armies will battle America; will overcome Europe.” She
also said “Russia will march upon all the nations of
Europe, particularly Italy, and will raise her flag over
the Dome of St. Peter’s” [Is Rome the city in ruins
revealed in the Third Secret?].
In the 1854 prophecy of Zachary, it
is also revealed that Russia and China will go to war
against the West and “North America will fall and be
conquered and brought into bondage.” For Russia or China to overrun the
United States military and its armed citizens in such
manner would seemingly presuppose we were previously
rendered incapacitated to some extent to defend
ourselves. This would indeed be the case after an EMP
attack.
When in his 1946 interview Professor
William Walsh asked Lucia if the United States would “be
overcome by Communism” if Russia is not consecrated in
time, she replied “Yes.”
Of course, only very weak men would
believe that hiding Our Lady’s prophecies in the Third
Secret would somehow prevent those prophecies from being
fulfilled. But that is exactly what the last five Popes
have done. This is why Lucia said the Church is under a
“diabolical disorientation.” The Popes have chosen to
disobey Our Lady, favoring their own remedies of
diplomacy and ecumenism rather than Heaven’s remedy of
the consecration of Russia. Pope John XXIII, who was
responsible for revealing the Third Secret in 1960, may
have believed the EMP threat did not exist during his
reign. He declared the inapplicability of the Third
Secret to his pontificate immediately after reading the
Secret in 1959. While this was no excuse to disobey Our
Lady’s express order to reveal the Secret in 1960, Pope
John’s decision can be rationalized, humanly speaking of
course. The EMP threat was not as real or comprehensible
during his pontificate.
However, John Paul II and Benedict
XVI have no such excuse. Reports have been released,
nuclear programs have advanced, and the threat has been
substantiated.
Nevertheless, in the words of John
Paul II, “truly the publication of such a message [the
Third Secret] is no longer something to be so much
desired.” Similarly, in the words of Benedict
XVI, “To publish the ‘third secret’ would mean exposing
the Church to the danger of sensationalism, exploitation
of the content.”
As inconceivable as it is, the conciliar
Popes have been more concerned about the world’s
reaction to the Secret rather than preventing
the prophecies of the Secret from coming true through
the consecration of Russia. Instead of obeying Our Lady
of Fatima and saving the world from disaster, these
Popes have chosen the Communist tactic of “perception
management,” as the Communists themselves plan to
destroy us and plunge the world into hell.
Our Lady commanded the consecration
of Russia to be performed in 1929 when an EMP attack was
not a legitimate threat. That threat became known around
1960 when Our Lady commanded the Secret to be revealed.
This may indicate an EMP attack (perhaps by Russia
against the United States) is the material chastisement
revealed in the Third Secret. Our Lady obviously wanted
the consecration to be performed (in 1929) before
the world knew of the EMP risk (in 1960), so that the
risk would be moot as the world experienced the promised
period of peace. But the Popes of Vatican II have chosen
their own ways. They have disobeyed God and brought
humanity to a frightful abyss.
In the end, we know a Pope will
consecrate Russia and Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart will
triumph. Whether we must first suffer the chastisements
of the Third Secret, however, remains to be seen. If these facts do not inspire us to
pray daily for the consecration of Russia, nothing will.
May God spare us from the coming chastisement through
the intercession of Our Lady of Fatima and the
consecration of Russia to Her Immaculate Heart.
For more information, please read
my new book, co-authored with Robert Sungenis, called
The Consecration of Russia – How Seven Popes Failed to
Heed Heaven’s Command and Brought Turmoil to the Church
and the World (February, 2013), available at
www.scripturecatholic.com.
Notes
On September 10, 1984, Bishop Alberto Cosme do
Amaral of Fatima stated the Third Secret did not
speak of “atomic bombs” or “nuclear warheads.”
While his statement undermines the proposed
thesis, note the following: First, the bishop
did not read the Secret and admitted his
conclusions were based on his personal study of
the matter (he wouldn’t say Lucia agreed with
his interpretation until 11 years later, in
1995). Second, he withdrew his 1984 remarks
before reasserting them again in 1995, which
calls into question the reliability of his
statement. Third, his statement attempted to
summarize “the meaning of the message” and its
primary import, namely, the “loss of faith”
which he said was “worse than the annihilation
of a nation”; hence, his statement does not
preclude the conclusion that a nuclear holocaust
is the revealed punishment for that “loss of
faith.” Fourth, both Cardinal Ratzinger and John
Paul II have collectively confirmed the Third
Secret reveals material chastisements which
threaten the world and where millions will die
instantly (and Ratzinger’s statement came after
that of do Amaral). Fifth, as noted, Ratzinger
has said the chastisement revealed at Akita
(fire raining from the sky) is essentially the
same as that revealed in the Third Secret.
Sixth, the part of the Third Secret released by
the Vatican in 2000 reveals a putative war scene
with the execution of the Pope and a city in
ruins and hence is not limited to spiritual
chastisements. Finally, Our Lady revealed that
various nations would be annihilated, which is
most certainly explained in the Third Secret
(and, interestingly, Bishop do Amaral equated
“nuclear holocaust” with “the annihilation of a
nation” in his 1984 statement).
|