Pius XII Offering the Tridentine Mass
(www.RemnantNewspaper.com)
As
Pope Pius XII is officially exonerated (by the recent
opening of secret Vatican archives) of any wrongdoing or
even an alleged “callous disregard” for the plight of
the Jews during the Nazi occupation of Europe, he still
remains the unlikely hero of extremist proponents of
so-called “natural” birth control in what’s left of the
Catholic Church since Vatican II. This is so because of
a 1951 address to the Italian midwives in which the Holy
Father allowed for grave circumstances which might
justify rare and limited use of natural means to
regulate births over and above periodic abstinence. The
exaggeration of Pius’s position ever since, cited in all
too many NFP courses, constitutes a gross injustice to
the memory of the late, great pontiff.
We are publishing (below) Pope Pius XII’s 1958 address
“The Large Family” for two reasons: 1) it reemphasizes
the consistent teaching of the Holy Father against
“family planning”—whether natural or otherwise, and 2)
within the context of the current controversy over
contraception and the American bishops it is important
for all of us to recall the traditional Catholic
teaching against contraception, regularly reiterated by
the popes up until the time of Vatican II.
Certainly natural family planning techniques can (and
often are!) used to promote large families, and there
can be no objection to this, of course. But when those
same techniques are used to prevent conception for any
and all reasons and for prolonged periods of
time—constituting a veritable Catholic form of
contraception—without the slightest regard for
Pius’s “grave reasons” (i.e, life-threatening
illnesses), they can hardly be regarded as being in
accord with his teaching, much less the mind of Holy
Mother Church. “I am not pleased with the statement in
the text that married couples may determine
the number of children they are to have,” wrote the
late, great Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, head of the Holy
Office before, during and after Vatican II, and also the
esteemed prelate who personally crowned Cardinal Montini
pope (Paul VI). “Never has this been heard
of in the Church,” he concluded. (The Rhine Flows
into the Tiber, by Father Ralph Wiltgen, Tan Books
and Publishers, 1967.)
Never has this been heard of in the Church!
Natural justice demands that the abuse of natural birth
control so rampant among otherwise faithful Catholics
today not be laid at the feet of the venerable pontiff,
who in fact said: “you can give irrefutable proofs of
the stupidity of birth-control theories and of the harm
that comes from putting them into practice; but as long
as there is no sincere determination to let the Creator
carry on His work as He chooses, then human selfishness
will always find new sophistries and excuses to still
the voice of conscience and to carry on abuses.”
I say “faithful Catholics” since only the most faithful
these days would bother to follow the Church’s teaching
against artificial contraception in the first place. But
this only exacerbates the problem, since in so many
instances, then, good Catholics are being led astray by
pastors who assure them with plenty of “new sophistries”
that they need only have the number of children they
“can afford” or they want; or that they’re perfectly
free to put off having any at all and for years, if need
be.
What the world needs desperately today is exactly what
Pius XII calls for in the following address—large
Catholic families and parents who trust completely in
God as the Author of all life. His Holiness would have
fallen to the floor in horror had he been informed that
a day was coming when young and perfectly healthy
Catholic couples would be required to learn how
to prevent conception—with 99% accuracy, no less!—as
part of their diocesan-mandated marriage preparation
classes, and that this inane policy would be justified
in his name!
The following address was delivered in January of 1958;
Pius died in October of that same year. In other words,
in one of his final messages to the world he went to
considerable lengths to stress the singular importance
of large families and to impart his papal blessing on
men and women who take no interest in what he called
“planned parenthood”, but rather open themselves
completely to the will of God where procreation is
concerned. And this was for good reason, since modern
society would soon thereafter declare total war not only
on large families, but also on the very ends of marriage
established by God Himself—the procreation and education
of children. Once that war was won, contraception, legal
abortion and gay “marriage” became societal
inevitabilities.
As the entire conference of US Catholic bishops is now
discovering with sobering ferocity, contraception is now
numbered among our inalienable rights as Americans, so
integral to the lives of “responsible citizens” that
taxpayers are obliged to subsidize, while Catholic
hospitals that refuse face the threat of
government-enforced shutdown.
In short, the chickens have come home to roost, and,
while Obama may well be the worst American president in
history, many of us hesitate to lay the blame for all of
this at his silly feet. He is, after all, a
Johnny-come-lately who really doesn’t know any better.
And while we all praise God for the American bishops’
decision to raise direct and organized protest against
the Obama mandate, we still find ourselves asking the
question: Where have they been all these years?
What galls many of us, in fact, is the fact that our
shepherds seem to be somehow surprised by all this—like
Captain Louis Renault in Casablanca, shocked to
find gambling going on in his favorite casino. For
years, the sheep have been living and dying under
similar culture-of-death decrees levied by this same
tyrannical wolf pack while the
shepherds did nothing. And
now they’re surprised?
Where were they when the Mass of our Fathers was stolen
from us? Weren’t they themselves running with the
wolves in that case? And, let’s be honest: Didn’t the
liturgical tsunami that followed, lead to universal
hemorrhaging of Catholic identity from the side of the
Mystical Body of Christ?
Aren’t these the same bishops who hired bulldozes to
pulverize the sanctuaries and altars of the churches of
our youth, thereby erasing the stone monuments to our
Catholic past and cutting us off from our fathers?
Isn’t it true that our bishops are still feverishly
selling off the churches our fathers built, in fact, in
order to pay their legal expenses for a clerical sex
scandal brought on by their own failed policies? Aren’t
these the men who even to this day are still
reprimanding faithful priests who refuse Holy Communion
to degenerates and public sinners?
Yes, indeed, our bishops are upset about Obama’s
contraception mandate. Thank God! But where were they
decades ago when contraception was first being pounded
down the throats of children in public schools and
elsewhere? Always less than enthusiastic about
Humanae Vitae, did they do anything to enforce the
Church’s teaching against contraception? Did most of
them bother to even mention it over the years?
Yes, now we hear plenty of ecclesial outrage over how
Obama’s mandate infringes on “freedom of religion”— but
what about contraception being a mortal sin, a
degradation of women, and a clear and present danger to
the common good of the whole country?
Where were our Catholic bishops when our Catholic
schools became so dangerous to the faith that untold
numbers of parents had to simply remove their children
and initiate home education programs? Why was nothing
done when little ones began losing their faith by the
generation in so-called ‘Catholic’ schools? Why is the
innocence-destroying Theology of the Body program still
being mandated by bishops and priests as part of young
people’s preparation classes to receive the Sacrament of
Confirmation? This is obscene!
Catholics didn’t lose their Catholic identity; it
was sold off by their bishops for a mess of
Modernist pottage. And now a secular government that has
no fear of a “reformed” and thus decimated Catholic
Church feels perfectly comfortable telling the American
bishops to go to hell just as surely as the American
bishops have been telling tradition-minded Catholics to
do the same for the past half century.
Traditionalists have been ostracized and called
schismatic for decades because they dared to suggest out
loud that this day was coming and that post-conciliar
Catholicism was no match for it. It was never merely the
loss of the Latin Mass that motivated traditionalists.
It was always the threat of Modernists occupying
positions of power in the Church, watering down liturgy
and doctrine, compromising the Faith, squandering
Catholic identity, and undermining the sensus
Catholicus to such an extent that the whole world
was doomed sooner or later to suffer persecution under a
tyrannical new world order whose deadly advance was
something only a strong Catholic Church could block. It
was not just souls that hung in the balance; as we’re
now coming to understand with chilling clarity, even the
future physical wellbeing of Christians has
become extremely uncertain.
How many times did the pioneer traditional Catholics
repeat it: Lex orandi, lex credendi! The law
of prayer is the law of belief. How we pray is how
we believe. Tradition-minded Catholics the world over
raised grassroots protest only after they’d been ordered
by their shepherds to stop worshipping like Catholics,
to abandon their own Traditions, and to take on the
mantle of what looked an awful lot like rank
Protestantism. To that end the bishops—not the
traditionalists, and certainly not Mr. Obama!—have
always been the problem; they are the ones who ripped
out the high altars, abandoned the Latin language,
replaced the ancient sacred music with pop tunes,
wrecked the Catholic school system, and demonstrated
precious little regard for
Catholic identity as a whole.
Is it any wonder CNN can so easily sneer that 85% of
Catholics don’t agree with their own Church’s teaching
against contraception? Under the bishops’ “reformed”
post-conciliar policies, Catholics began to pray like
everyone else in the modern world, think like everyone
else, divorce, annul and contracept at the same
diabolical rate. We went from Mother Cabrini to Nancy
Pelosi, and from Bishop Fulton Sheen to Cardinal Roger
Mahony in the span of a mere generation or two. And the
bishops themselves led the sheep right into the wolf’s
lair. And now that a militantly secular government
boldly encroaches on their territory—disregarding their
position and influence in society—the shepherds are
suddenly asking the sheep to believe they’ve had a
change of heart and are going to protect them from the
wolves from now on. Well, let’s hope so.
I suppose it would be cynical and judgmental to suggest
that our bishops may also be concerned about a potential
dam in the revenue stream from Uncle Sam, so I won’t
suggest that. But it does appear that maintaining their
precious tax-exempt status may be of greater concern to
many of them than even the souls of their sheep. Not a
word about contraception for years from their clappy-happy,
sporty pulpits—and now they’re shocked—just
shocked!—to
find the insufferable Obama trying to force
contraception down the country’s throat.
Too little, too late
isn’t a big enough cliché. Our bishops have been
selling rifles to the Indians for years, and now when
the fort is under fire and in fact burning to the
ground, we can only ask them: Your Excellencies, what
were you thinking!?
If only they’d heeded the warnings of Pope Pius X, Pius
XI, Pius XII as the so-called traditional Catholics
(read: faithful sheep) begged them to do for so
many, many years. Now, it may well be too late. MJM
The Large Family
by Pius XII
Beloved sons and daughters, Officers and Representatives
of the Associations for Large Families of Rome and of
Italy, this visit of yours has to be listed among those
that bring deepest pleasure to Our heart.
You are well aware of the lively interest We have in
family life, of how We never miss an opportunity to
point out its many-sided dignity, to reassert its rights
and defend them, to inculcate the duties it involves—in
a word, We make it a key-point of Our pastoral teaching.
It is this same anxious interest in families that makes
Us agree so readily to spend at least a few moments with
family groups that come to Our home (whenever the duties
of Our office do not make this impossible), and this is
why, on occasion, We consent to be photographed in the
midst of them, so as to leave some kind of lasting
record of Our joy and theirs.
Father of the human family
The Pope in the midst of a family! Isn’t that right
where he belongs? Isn’t he (in the loftiest spiritual
sense of the word) the Father of the whole human family
that has been reborn in Christ and in the Church? Is it
not through him, the Vicar of Christ on earth, that the
wonderful plan of creative Wisdom is put into effect — a
plan that has conferred on all human fatherhood the
destiny of preparing a chosen family for heaven, where
the love of the One and Triune God will enfold them in a
single eternal embrace and give them Himself as the
inheritance that will make them perfectly happy?
A triple testimony
But you do not represent just any families at all; you
are and represent large families, those most blessed by
God and specially loved and prized by the Church as its
most precious treasures. For these families offer
particularly clear testimony to three things that serve
to assure the world of the truth of the Church’s
doctrine and the soundness of its practice, and that
redound, through good example, to the great benefit of
all other families and of civil society itself.
Wherever you find large families in great numbers, they
point to: the physical and moral health of a Christian
people; a living faith in God and trust in His
Providence; the fruitful and joyful holiness of Catholic
marriage.
We would like to say a few words about each of these
points.
Surely, one of the most harmful aberrations that has
appeared in modern society with its pagan tendencies is
the opinion of those who are eager to classify
fruitfulness in marriage as a “social malady,” and who
maintain that any nation that finds itself thus
afflicted must exert every effort and use every means to
cure the disease. This is the basis for the propaganda
that goes under the name of “planned parenthood”; at
times it is promoted by persons and organizations who
command respect because of their positions in other
fields, but who, unfortunately, have taken a stand in
this matter which must be condemned.
Birth control
Sad as it is to realize how widespread doctrines and
practices of this kind have become, even among the
traditionally healthy classes, it is comforting to see
indications and proofs of a healthy reaction in your
country, both in the legal and in the medical fields. As
you know, article 31 of the current Constitution of the
Italian Republic, to cite just one source, pays “special
attention to large families,” and the prevailing
teaching among Italian doctors is a long a line of
opposition ever more strongly against birth-control
practices.
This does not mean that the danger has passed and that
we have destroyed the prejudices which tend to make
marriage and its wise norms submit to the aims of
reprehensible pride and parentness on the part of
society or of individuals. We particularly deplore that
section of the press that every so often takes up the
question once again with the obvious intention of
confusing good people and drawing them into error with
misleading evidence, questionable polls, and even
falsified statements from some cleric or other.
Obedience to nature’s laws
On the part of Catholics, We must urge the wide
dissemination of the principle, firmly founded on truth,
that the only way to protect the physical and moral
health of the family and of society is through
whole-hearted obedience to the laws of nature, or rather
of the Creator, and most of all by fostering a sacred,
heart-felt respect for them.
In this matter, everything depends on the intention. You
can multiply laws and make the penalties heavier; you
can give irrefutable proofs of the stupidity of
birth-control theories and of the harm that comes from
putting them into practice; but as long as there is no
sincere determination to let the Creator carry on His
work as He chooses, then human selfishness will always
find new sophistries and excuses to still the voice of
conscience (to the extent it can), and to carry on
abuses.
Now the value of the testimony offered by the parents of
large families lies not only in their unequivocal and
forceful rejection of any deliberate compromise between
the law of God and human selfishness, but also in their
readiness to accept joyfully and gratefully these
priceless gifts of God—their children — in whatever
number it may please Him to send them.
This kind of attitude frees married couples from
oppressive anxieties and remorse, and, in the opinion of
outstanding doctors, creates the ideal psychological
conditions for the healthy development of children born
of the marriage. For, right at the beginning of these
new lives, it eliminates all those worries and
disturbances that can so easily leave physical or
psychological scars on the mother or child.
Apart from exceptional cases and We have had occasion to
speak of these before — nature’s law is basically one of
harmony, and it leads to discord and contradictions only
in cases where its normal operation is upset by
particular circumstances which are for the most part
abnormal, or by deliberate opposition from a human will.
There is no eugenics that can improve upon nature: it is
good as a science only so long as it aims at gaining a
profound knowledge of nature’s laws and respects these
laws — although in some cases it may be wise to dissuade
people who suffer from serious defects from getting
married (cfr. Enc. Casti connubii, Dec. 31, 1930:
A.A.S. 22 (1930) p. 565).
Physical and moral health
Again, good common sense has always and everywhere
looked upon large families as a sign, a proof, and a
source of physical health, and history makes no mistake
when it points to violation and abuse of the laws
governing marriage and procreation as the primary cause
of the decay of peoples.
Far from being a “social malady,” large families are a
guarantee of the moral and physical health of a people.
Virtues flourish spontaneously in homes where a baby’s
cries always echo from the crib, and vice is put to
flight, as if it has been chased away by the childhood
that is renewed there like the fresh and invigorating
breath of spring.
So let the weak and selfish take their example from you;
let the nation continue to be loving and grateful toward
you for all the sacrifices you have taken upon
yourselves to raise and educate its citizens; just as
the Church is pleased with you for enabling her to
offer, along with you, ever healthier and larger groups
of souls to the sanctifying activity of the divine
Spirit.
II
In the modern civil world a large family is usually,
with good reason, looked upon as evidence of the fact
that the Christian faith is being lived up to, for the
selfishness that We just pointed out as the principal
obstacle to an increase in the size of a family group
cannot be successfully overcome without recourse to
ethical and religious principles.
In recent times we have seen how so-called “demographic
politics” have failed to achieve any noteworthy results;
it is easy to see why, for the individual interest will
almost always win out over the collective pride and
selfishness which this idea so often expresses, and the
aims and methods of this policy debase the dignity of
the family and the person by placing them on the same
level as lower species.
The light of Christianity
Only the divine and eternal light of Christianity gives
full life and meaning to the family and this is so true
that right from the beginning and through the whole
course of its history, large families have often been
considered as synonymous with Christian families.
Respect for divine laws has made them abound with life;
faith in God gives parents the strength and vigor they
need to face the sacrifice and self-denial demanded for
the raising of their children; Christian principles
guide them and help them in the hard work of education;
the Christian spirit of love watches over their peace
and good order, and seems to draw forth from nature and
bestow the deepest family joys that belong to parents,
to children, to brothers and sisters.
Even externally, a large, well-ordered family is a kind
of visible shrine: the sacrament of Baptism is not an
exceptional event for them but something constantly
renewing the joy and grace of the Lord. The series of
happy pilgrimages to the Baptismal font is not yet
finished when a new one to Confirmation and first
Communion begins, aglow with the same innocence. The
youngest of the children will scarcely have put away his
little white suit among the dearest memories of life,
when the first wedding veil appears to bring parents,
children, and new relatives together at the foot of the
altar. More marriages, more Baptisms, more first
Communions follow each other like ever-new springtimes
that, in a sense, make the visits of God and of His
grace to the home unending.
Trust in God
But God also visits large families with His Providence,
and parents, especially those who are poor, give clear
testimony to this by resting all their trust in Him when
human efforts are not enough. A trust that has a solid
foundation and is not in vain! Providence — to put it in
human words and ideas — is not a sum total of
exceptional acts of divine pity; it is the ordinary
result of harmonious activity on the part of the
infinite wisdom, goodness and omnipotence of the
Creator. God will never refuse a means of living to
those He calls into being.
The Divine Master has explicitly taught that “life is
worth more than food, and the body more than clothing”
(cf. Matt. 6, 25). If single incidents, whether small or
great, seem to contradict this, it is a sign that man
has placed some obstacle in the way of divine order, or
else, in exceptional cases, that God has higher plans
for good; but Providence is something real, something
necessary since God is the Creator.
Overpopulation
[In the interest of conserving column space we’re
cutting Pius’s short section on overpopulation, in which
he points out that even if it weren’t a conspiracy
theory, so-called overpopulation still would not justify
a decrease in family size, that it is necessarily a
consequence of greed, and that advancements in science
should easily wipe out any concern that larger
population numbers might cause hunger and depletion of
the earth’s resources. MJM]
III
And now a few words on your third testimony — words that
may give new strength to those who are fearful and bring
you a little comfort.
Large families are the most splendid flower-beds in the
garden of the Church; happiness flowers in them and
sanctity ripens in favorable soil. Every family group,
even the smallest, was meant by God to be an oasis of
spiritual peace. But there is a tremendous difference:
where the number of children is not much more than one,
that serene intimacy that gives value to life has a
touch of melancholy or of pallor about it; it does not
last as long, it may be more uncertain, it is often
clouded by secret fears and remorse.
Happiness in a large family
It is very different from the serenity of spirit to be
found in parents who are surrounded by a rich abundance
of young lives. The joy that comes from the plentiful
blessings of God breaks out in a thousand different ways
and there is no fear that it will end. The brows of
these fathers and mothers may be burdened with cares,
but there is never a trace of that inner shadow that
betrays anxiety of conscience or fear of an irreparable
return to loneliness. Their youth never seems to fade
away, as long as the sweet fragrance of a crib remains
in the home, as long as the walls of the house echo to
the silvery voices of children and grandchildren.
Their heavy labors multiplied many times over, their
redoubled sacrifices and their renunciation of costly
amusements are generously rewarded even here below by
the inexhaustible treasury of affection and tender hopes
that dwell in their hearts without ever tiring them or
bothering them.
And the hopes soon become a reality when the eldest
daughter begins to help her mother to take care of the
baby and on the day the oldest son comes home with his
face beaming with the first salary he has earned
himself. That day will be a particularly happy one for
parents, for it will make the spectre of an old age
spent in misery disappear, and they will feel assured of
a reward for their sacrifices.
When there are many children, the youngsters are spared
the boredom of loneliness and the discomfort of having
to live in the midst of adults all the time. It is true
that they may sometimes become so lively as to get on
your nerves, and their disagreements may seem like small
riots; but even their arguments play an effective role
in the formation of character, as long as they are brief
and superficial. Children in large families learn almost
automatically to be careful of what they do and to
assume responsibility for it, to have a respect for each
other and help each other, to be open-hearted and
generous. For them, the family is a little proving
ground, before they move into the world outside, which
will be harder on them and more demanding.
Vocations
All of these precious benefits will be more solid and
permanent, more intense and more fruitful if the large
family takes the supernatural spirit of the Gospel,
which spiritualizes everything and makes it eternal, as
its own particular guiding rule and basis. Experience
shows that in these cases, God often goes beyond the
ordinary gifts of Providence, such as joy and peace, to
bestow on it a special call — a vocation to the
priesthood, to the religious life, to the highest
sanctity.
With good reason, it has often been pointed out that
large families have been in the forefront as the cradles
of saints. We might cite, among others, the family of
St. Louis, the King of France, made up of ten children,
that of St. Catherine of Siena who came from a family of
twenty-five, St. Robert Bellarmine from a family of
twelve, and St. Pius X from a family of ten.
Every vocation is a secret of Providence; but these
cases prove that a large number of children does not
prevent parents from giving them an outstanding and
perfect upbringing; and they show that the number does
not work out to the disadvantage of their quality, with
regard to either physical or spiritual values.
Vigilance and action
One last word to you, Directors and Representatives of
the Associations for Large Families of Rome and of
Italy. Be careful to imprint the seal of an ever more
vigilant and fruitful dynamism on the action that you
intend to carry out in behalf of the dignity of large
families and for their economic protection.
With regard to the first of these aims, keep in line
with the directives of the Church; with regard to the
second, you have to shake out of its lethargy that part
of society that is not yet aware of its social
responsibilities. Providence is a divine truth and
reality, but it chooses to make use of human
cooperators. Ordinarily it moves into action and comes
to our aid when it has been summoned and practically led
by the hand by man; it loves to lie hidden behind human
activity. While it is only right to acknowledge that
Italian legislation can legitimately boast of being most
advanced in this area of affording protection to
families and especially to large families, We should not
close our eyes to the fact that there are still a
considerable number of them who are tossed back and
forth between discomfort and real privation, through no
fault of their own. Your action must aim at bringing
these people the protection of the laws, and in more
urgent cases the help of charity. Every positive
achievement in this field is like a solid stone set into
the structure of the nation and of the church; it is the
very best thing you can do as Catholics and as citizens.
Calling down the divine protection upon your families
and those of all Italy, placing them once again under
the heavenly protection of the Holy Family of Jesus,
Mary and Joseph, We impart to you with all Our heart Our
paternal Apostolic Blessing.
PPXII |