Remnant
Editor's Note: The
following article appeared over
at the Huffington Post on
September 26, 2012. It was
entitled "Why Are the Freemasons
Collecting Our Children's DNA?"
and was written by Amy
MacFerson.
Of course, we
don't agree with every
conclusion Ms. MacFerson's
draws; however, we find it more
than interesting that even
Left-leaning news outlets are
now questioning the bizarre
antics of the Lodge where our
children and the so called "MasoniChips"
are concerned. Ms.
MacFerson may be a liberal but
she is asking important
questions most "conservative"
journalists wouldn't touch with
a ten-foot pole.
We're
publishing a slightly edited
version of the Huffington Post
article, while asking our
readers to remain mindful of the
fact that no single organization
has been condemned by the
Catholic Church more often or
with a greater degree of papal
authority than Freemasonry.
There is a reason for this, just
as there is a reason why
Cardinal Ratzinger himself, as
prefect of the CDF, noted back
in 1983 that Freemasonry has "always
been considered irreconcilable
with the doctrine of the Church
and, therefore, membership in
them remains forbidden. The
faithful, who enroll in Masonic
associations are in a state of
grave sin and may not receive
Holy Communion."
This is not
"black helicopters" stuff!
Freemasonry and the forces
of naturalism have for centuries
been hard at work trying to
create a global Utopia without
God, borders, the Catholic
Church, even the traditional
family. Some refer to their
Utopian dream as the "New World
Order"; others call it the Reign
of Antichrist. Whatever
you call it, the fact that
Freemasons are now busying
themselves collecting the DNA of
children around the world should
give us all pause, to say the
least... Michael J. Matt
Why Are the Freemasons
Collecting Our Children's DNA?
Amy MacFerson
(Huffington Post)
www.huffingtonpost.ca/amy-macpherson/freemason_b_1906521.html
Conspiracy
theorists need theorize no more.
In pages from a fiction novel
brought to life, the strangest
twists in popular folklore have
been winding through our
government corridors. In this
case I wouldn't blame you for
being tempted to run it by
Snopes.
Fabled as a
secret society, Freemasons see
themselves as an esoteric
fraternity; an ancient
brotherhood of initiates who are
voted into membership for the
purpose of sharing enlightenment
through the use of exclusive
teachings.
They are not a
religious group and yet elevated
status can be obtained through
invitation to the various
esteemed Rites and the legendary
Knights Templar...
Despite an
effort to distance themselves
from politics and religion in
modern times, Scandinavian
branches to this day will only
permit entry of fellow Christian
worshippers.
Women remain forbidden
although there's good news for
slaves and the disabled -- who
may have overcome discrimination
after a thousand years of human
rights progression.
On the
Grand Lodge of Canada website,
they continue to affirm this
illusive aura with statements
like the following:
"Freemasonry is a fraternal
association of men of good
and high ideals but it is
not a public association.
"Private" is a more
appropriate description than
"secret" and as with many
organizations, certain
information is reserved for
members only."
So why then is
an exclusive group collecting
our children's DNA, with support
of police and the government
across the USA and Canada?
Quote from
Unholy Craft: Freemasonry and the Roots
of Christophobia
(Available from
The Remnant
here)
Here is how, in 1913, the
American Jesuit priest, Hermann
Gruber, outlined the Masonic
program based on its expression
in various Masonic journals in
the United States:
·
To completely destroy the social
influence exercised by the
Church and religion in general,
whether by open persecution or
by so-called separation of
Church and State.
·
To secularize or laicise all
private and public life and,
above all, public education.
·
To develop, systematically,
freedom of thought and
conscience among school
children; to protect children
as much as possible from all of
the disastrous influences
exercised over them by their
parents or the Church and to
that end even, if necessary, to
use constraints.[1]
[1]The
Catholic Encyclopedia,
New York, Encyclopedia
Press, 1913, p. 78.3,
article ‘Freemasonry’
by Father Hermann
Gruber; quoted by Paul
A. Fisher, Behind the
Lodge’s Door, p. 40.
You know them
as
MasoniChip, or
perhaps you've been led to
believe it was a state and
provincial endeavor intended to
protect your little ones. They
set up fairs, forge partnerships
with law enforcement and even
strive to distribute their
services through North American
public school systems.
In
Massachusetts this Freemason
program was promoted by CBS News
from the steps of the official
State House and included
their police dog, coincidentally
named Mason. Reporters
only failed to mention the
private nod to those promoting
him or that government had
little to do with it.
What is
MasoniChip you ask? It
begins on the surface as a child
identification project, in case
your loved ones are ever to be
horrendously abducted. Parents
are familiar with at-home kits
to record their kids' vital
information, for protection
against the greatest of all
fears to be inflicted on a
family. Normally height, weight,
hair and eye colour are
recorded, along with a set of
fingerprints and hopefully a
current photograph. It's just
the good folks at your local
Masonic Lodge saw fit to take
things further.
With advances
in technology, they began to
offer digital fingerprints,
digital imaging, digital video,
dental impressions and DNA mouth
swabs. This data processing is
managed by their proprietary
software that's designed to be
compatible with local and
national law enforcement. This
is after all, a campaign created
by
police in the brotherhood
regardless of its private
funding.
A great
distinction is made to ensure
governments are nothing more
than their supporters.
Freemasons assert ownership of
this project as an integral part
of their
mission statement:
"We the
Freemasons are the sole
"sponsor" of the Masonic
Safety Identification
initiatives as developed in
our various Masonic Grand
Lodge Jurisdictions. As such
we schedule the Events and
coordinate the equipment,
materials and volunteers
necessary to conduct events.
All groups and individuals
are welcome to work
alongside, but they are not
referred as sponsors but
listed and involved as
"supporters", "supporting
partners", "corporate
partners", "in collaboration
with", or "in cooperation
with."
They claim
their services are superior to
what a parent could accomplish
at home, by recording the
children's data personally and
providing their own "health
care professionals" to
collect their DNA samples.
These are
either hired hands who answer to
the Freemasons or members of the
fraternity whose history and
credentials are protected by the
organization. There is no way to
guarantee what happens behind
closed doors and although they
claim to delete sensitive
information (the Canadian
website
states "No information is
ever stored by the MasoniChIP
program"), any computer savvy
person knows that clicking an
"x" isn't permanent unless you
format the entire system.
Parents are
asked to trust an intriguing,
private fraternity; to ensure
that quality standards are met
and family privacy is legally
respected without any kind of
oversight. Because Freemasons
fund 100 per cent of the
initiative, there is no
opportunity to discuss issues
regarding data ownership or how
they feel about those
technicalities in the privacy of
their meetings.
Quote
from Unholy Craft: Freemasonry and the Roots
of Christophobia
(Available from
The Remnant
here)
On March 24th, 1763, the
Freemason, La Chalotais, General
Prosecutor of the Breton
parliament, presented his
national educational plan.
Among other things, this
document made provision for:
-
a State monopoly of all
education;
-
the preparation of new
textbooks;
-
secularism
-
the control of children
from the ages of 6 to 18
years.[1]
[1]Re
the Chalotais programme,
see N Deschamps, op.
cit., v. II, p. 73
onwards.
Every Masonic
Lodge may "jump
on the bandwagon" and choose
to run the program differently.
None are managed at the national
level by an exact set of
principles. The only thing they
share is an
internet portal, where
everyone claims to expunge the
information that was
painstakingly collected.
Let us then
consider the function of a DNA
sample. If a child goes missing
will police swab every glass and
rock they come across for a
match to find the trail? In the
video for Massachusetts they
claimed it would help Mason
pick up a scent, but in all
reality the clothes a child was
last wearing will provide
stronger notes and this can't be
the intended purpose. DNA has
nothing to do with scent and its
only use can be harnessed once a
child has been located.
With somber
scrutiny and if further tragedy
struck, authorities would match
remains with parental samples
for definitive confirmation. It
is the parents' DNA that could
aid in matching the unnamed, but
only accredited laboratories are
permitted to conduct the
process. Whether a parent or
child, collecting DNA cannot
occur at an open park event, run
by stranger volunteers and
become admissible to the
national database. The
FBI continually quotes the
DNA Identification Act of
1994 in establishing these
requirements to be included
within CODIS.
It is with
great sadness for grieving
families that we must note the
Freemason project is not
supported by government DNA
databases. Although the
superficial identifiers are
surely helpful and Freemasons
contribute to charitable acts in
their communities, the most
controversial component of the
MasoniChip undertaking
is not recognized for the
purpose they advertise and state
to parents.
Quote
from Unholy Craft: Freemasonry and the Roots
of Christophobia
(Available
from The Remnant
here)
Therefore, the Church’s negative
judgment in regard to Masonic
associations remains unchanged
since their principles have
always been considered
irreconcilable with the doctrine
of the Church and, therefore,
membership in them remains
forbidden. The faithful, who
enroll in Masonic associations
are in a state of grave sin and
may not receive Holy Communion.
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
CDF, November 26, 1983
Furthermore, a
simple hair sample from children
is all that was needed and in
the
United States only five of
these cases are permitted per
month, per licenced agency.
(Downloadable from the FBI
here.)
In Canada
the situation is even more
colluded, as the federal
government won't consent to a
missing persons DNA database
whatsoever. They cite privacy
law and cost concerns as a
barrier to its establishment; so
the 50,000 families that already
participated have shared their
biometric markers with
Freemasons for apparently no
good reason. It is therefore
peculiar the Masonic Grand Lodge
of Canada would make
bold claims to be working
with Canadian law enforcement
agencies to gain the trust of
parents.
All in all
they've registered
1.5 million children to
date. The push is on to document
as many possible, as keenly
demonstrated by the
event schedule for Ontario.
From community halls to grocery
stores, fairground booths,
libraries and even chartered
banks, the private fraternity
will be on hand to collect
everything about your children
whether it's relevant or not.
When it comes
to the little people we'd do
anything to protect them, but
perhaps their families might
give sober second thought to
what exactly they're signing in
a contract with Freemasons. This
DNA collection program is
planned to be extended to the
disabled community and seniors,
but who benefits when it's
inadmissible to a certified
registry of any sort?
And why is the
face of government through
public schools or police through
public events, being placed on
an effort from private
organizations to mislead
parents? Sharing one's
fingerprints and biometrics is a
serious decision. For public
safety we must insist that
brokers of such events become
transparent and regulated.