Fr. Adolfo Nicolás, Superior
General of the
Jesuits (center), Edmund Lo, SJ,
Artur Suski, SJ
(www.RemnantNewspaper.com)
Most devout Catholics have favorite saints and many also
have favorite Popes, some sainted and some not. For
Traditionalists, two popes that come to mind are Pope
Saint Pius V and Pope Saint Pius X, the former for
declaring that the traditional form of the Liturgy could
never be abrogated and the latter for his uncompromising
war against the heresy of Modernism, among many other
notable achievements and personal sanctity.
Many Novus Ordo Catholics, conservatives
included, would probably name Pope John Paul II as their
personal favorite, as the Santo Subito chant
continues to resonate through the halls of the Vatican
and across the fields of World Youth Day.
For many seminarians who have attended the Gregorian
University in Rome, their favorite Pope is Clement XIV,
whose pontificate was in the Eighteenth Century. In
fact, the graduating NACers (North American
College seminarians), most of whom will be ordained to
the Holy Priesthood within days or weeks, have a curious
ritual following their final exams. They process a few
hundred feet from the Gregorian University to the Church
of the Twelve Apostles (Santi XII Apostoli) and
each one lays a single rose at the tomb of this often
otherwise overlooked Pontiff. Why? As a sign of respect
and gratitude to the Pope who suppressed the Society of
Jesus.
Terrible, you say? Not if you were in their seminarian
shoes, subjected to the arrogance and mean-spiritedness
of many of their Jesuit professors for four years. Their
nickname for the Jesuits, by the way, is The Trolls,
a name well-deserved by many of them in higher
education.
Speaking of higher education and the Society Men in
Black, perhaps some Remnant readers have heard of
the queer conference series—their word, not
mine—planned for two American Jesuit Universities and
two Protestant Divinity Schools. This four-part
conference, scheduled for the fall of this year, is
titled, More Than a Monologue: Sexual Diversity and
the Catholic Church. Each campus will host an event
on one the following topics: Learning to Listen:
Voices of Sexual Diversity and the Catholic Church;
Pro-Queer Life: Youth Suicide Crisis, Catholic
Education, and the Souls of LGBTQ People; Same-Sex
Marriage and the Catholic Church: Voices from Law,
Religion, and the Pews; The Care of Souls: Sexual
Diversity, Celibacy, and Ministry. On an official
web page for the conference series (http://blog.fairfield.edu/morethanamonologue/)
the introduction reads:
For too long, the conversation on lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender issues in the Roman Catholic Church has
been only a monologue — the sole voice being heard is
that of the institutional Catholic Church. We must
engage in more than a monologue by having a 21st
century conversation on sexual diversity, with new and
different voices heard from.
A sample of thought from a representative of each
institution is quoted on the web as well, to include the
following:
For too long, the conversation on lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender issues in the Catholic Church
has hardly been a conversation at all. We hope to move
beyond the usual back and forth of official church
statements and gay Catholic activists’ responses by
showing how the issue of sexual diversity affects all
Catholics — active or former, gay or straight, female or
male, of every culture, race and ethnicity. The time
has come for us to learn to listen to all their voices
and engage in a more enlightened, compassionate, and
honest conversation.
Educational institutions must take responsibility for
protecting against the culture and attitudes that
contribute to LGBTQ suicide. The “Pro-Queer Life”
conference will focus attention on where Catholic
educational institutions are getting it right, where
they need to be better, and where their complicity in
the wounding of young LGBTQ persons is unacceptable.
When the Connecticut Supreme Court legalized same-sex
marriage in the fall of 2008, the Connecticut Bishops
responded first with a public statement offered on
behalf of all the Catholic faithful in the state
(without their deliberation or consent) condemning the
decision and arguing that marriage was not a civil right
to be exercised by gay and lesbian people. In neither
their public statement nor their ads did the Bishops
represent the voices of all the Catholic faithful.
Other Catholic points of view—from expertise in ethics,
theology, law and the special tasks of the laity in the
world—can and must be heard for a more robust
discussion.
Same-Sex
Marriage and the Catholic Church: Voices from Law,
Religion and the Pews aims to provide that
forum.
The Catholic Church has large numbers of lesbian, gay,
bisexual or transgender laity engaged in pastoral work
in the Church and many gay clergy. But the official
standpoint of the teaching Church makes their status as
lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender problematic for
individuals, their communities, and the Church. This
creates conflicts and tensions for many, while hiding
the fact that all Christians contribute to Church life
because of, not despite who they are. So at the “Care
of Souls” conference we will be examining the challenges
of the baptismal call to ministry in the lives of LGBT
Catholics and looking at how a more positive and
fruitful situation can be created.
Have you read enough from the source itself to get the
gist? In the spirit of the once-orthodox Society of
Jesus perhaps we should have an Inquisition: of the
morally bankrupt “black robes” within the ranks of the
Jesuits, especially in higher education. But an
Inquisition is unnecessary, for in their hubris they
expose and condemn themselves by their own public words
and deeds. The fact that they do so over and over again
with impunity reveals just how impotent the
institutional Church has become in modernist times to
crush the head of the Serpent when he exposes his
poisoned fangs from beneath the heel of the Blessed
Mother.
No, it is not an inquisition that is needed but a
suppression of a rogue Society. Far too many of their
members and their institutions have shown themselves
willing to sacrifice children to the pagan god Moloch by
their support of abortion related causes and candidates
and to sacrifice the sexual purity of their students to
the pagan god of Sodom. In effect, the Society of Jesus
has become the Society of Judas. Yes, a remnant
of righteous Jesuits continues and suffers in the midst
of the rest but it now appears that the bad so outweigh
the good that the course of action of Pope Clement XIV
seems more appropriate than ever in the present time and
circumstances. |