But then someone named Terry Carroll entered the picture. Over the past year it seems he has assumed the position of the “brains” of the CMTV operation (if not also the banker). In February of 2014 there suddenly appeared on the website of Church Militant TV (CMTV) what Louie Verrecchio aptly called “the mystery manifesto,” which is now known to have been authored by Carroll. This document advanced the curious proposition, unsupported by any teaching of the Magisterium, that while Catholics are free to engage in public criticism of any member of the hierarchy whose actions warrant it, as CMTV does every day, they may never criticize the Pope publicly because “the Pope is different.” CMTV, wrote Carroll, “will not engage in public criticism of the Pope. Period.”
Fine. Whatever. But Carroll did not stop there. His manifesto was only the beginning of a truly obsessive campaign to proclaim his idiosyncratic opinion as the moral standard for Catholics who write for the traditionalist press. In the same manifesto Carroll declared that The Remnant, Catholic Family News, John Vennari and yours truly, are publishers of “spiritual pornography” because we have been critical of what the press likes to call “the Francis revolution.”
For some reason, however, Carroll has hurled no such accusation at non-traditionalist commentators, many of whom have written things , there was Voris denouncing Salt and Light TV because it had attacked Cardinal Burke for expressing the very sentiments Voris himself had censored and apologized for airing! Adherence to the Carroll Policy had twisted the poor man into a pretzel.
This, then, is the problem with apostolates controlled by people like Carroll, who is more interested in turf defense than truth. It was expediency, not principle, that motivated him first to claim that the Pope may never be criticized in public, only to admit that the Pope can be criticized in public once it became apparent that CMTV’s credibility was being destroyed by his original position. And it is expediency, not principle, that dictates Carroll’s current position that when CMTV publicly excoriates “wicked” bishops and cardinals as worthy of damnation this shows “love for the Church,” while The Remnant’s and CFN’s criticisms of Francis’s pontificate, employing no such invective, are beyond the pale. (The Remnant and CFN, echoing Sister Lucia of Fatima, often refer to “diabolical disorientation” in the Church, but this connotes confusion rather than subjective guilt, although there are some neo-Modernist prelates who are clearly deliberate enemies of the Faith.)
Terry Carroll has single-handedly destroyed what could have been a fruitful collaboration between CMTV and the traditionalist media. I don’t know how deeply Carroll has his clutches into CMTV’s operations, but I would say this to Mike Voris out of respect for what he is trying to do for the good of the Church: if there is any way you can dissociate yourself from this character, do it now before he inflicts irreparable damage on your apostolate.