FaceBook 48x48   Twitter 48x48   Feed 48x48

 

 

Headline News Around the World

Search

Monday, July 25, 2016

Why Would Rome’s ‘Doctors of the Law’ Want the SSPX Regularized?

Written by 
Rate this item
(48 votes)

carkaps
The admonishment is stated so often in discussions about inner Church workings that many people treat it as axiomatic: Do not view the Church through a political lens, the Church is different.

Yes, the Church is different. You cannot view the Church as simply aligning with your local political situation, but the Church is inherently political. Where there are people involved, there is politics. And I venture to say that not only is this current period no exception, it is quickly setting new levels.

A fair amount of ink has been spilled in recent weeks over the controversy that erupted after Cardinal Sarah's London speech suggesting that priests might want to check out ad orientem worship this coming advent.

In all likelihood, the Cardinal’s suggestion would have been mostly ignored by the vast majority of priests. Of the few that may have been interested, most of those under Modernist Bishops are too well-versed in the consequences of such things to even consider such a move. Perhaps there exists a tiny subset of priests willing to try ad orientem that exists under the few bishops who would look kindly upon such a thing, but the response to Cardinal Sarah's suggestion would have been minuscule. So why even pay any attention to it?  

Well, the powers and principalities in the hierarchy did much more than pay attention to it. Although the Vatican Press office has shown itself completely incapable over the last 3 years of dispelling any of the confusion that arises from the calculated ambiguity of the Pope, suddenly the Holy See Press office develops “quick reaction force” capabilities when someone in the Vatican machinery accidently speaks like a Catholic.

Equally amazing is how those who daily disparage the 'Doctors of the Law' have suddenly morphed into strict rubricists unwilling to brook even the slightest perceived deviation from the GIRM. This sudden reactionary rubricism seems limited only to false interpretations of the GIRM, because anyone who has spent more than five minutes looking at the question understands that the 'wherever possible' of GIRM 299 applies to the placement of the altar and not the orientation of the priest. But mass 'facing the people' is the pre-eminent unwritten rubric of the Spirit of Vatican II, and thus turning together toward God will not be allowed and so the NuChurch ninjas were quickly deployed. But, no worries, the Vatican shows no signs of giving a hoot about any of the other daily violations of the GIRM so commonplace at the empty masses of today.

A reasonable person must look at the situation and the response and ask the simple question, "Why? Why such a reaction?"

The answer, in part, is politics.

It has been suggested that the Vatican and the Pope must really be afraid of ad orientem worship, of people turning back to God. I suppose that is true to a point, but they certainly didn’t fear that happening on account of Cardinal Sarah’s remarks. So again, why?

That is what this whole versus populum dustup is all about. It isn't that they fear ad orientem, quite the opposite, they fear the temporal power in Rome. Cardinal Sarah was crushed, not because they fear the spread of ad orientem, that wouldn't have happened even if the Vatican did nothing. They crushed him because they could. And now bishops and their toady conferences are rushing to join in because it is a consequence-free way of publicly pledging allegiance to the Novus Ordo regime without consequence. The only people who actually care about such things are few and far between, out of power, and easily marginalized. This is about power, pure and simple. Those who have it wield it, and those who want to keep theirs pledge allegiance to NuChurch by making a show of public obeisance to its cardinal unwritten rubric.

They are sending a political message. Continued opposition to NuChurch will not be tolerated. If we are willing to publicly oppose and humiliate a highly-placed Cardinal in the Church for saying something obviously good, true, and traditional, think of what we are willing to do to bishops of whom nobody has ever heard. Get on board or get out. Resistance is futile.

I think this is probably true of the new Apostolic Constitution, Vultum Dei quaerere, on women's contemplative life (VDQ). People may be tempted to think that they must really fear these few little pockets of traditional orders since they’ll go to all this trouble to quash them. But again, it is, in part, about the exercise of pure political power. They don’t like the fact that bishops and little orders under their control can resist. These pockets of resistance are few and far between and pose no real threat to the vast edifice of NuChurch, but the idea that resistance is even possible is intolerable to them. They have the power to squash it and they will use that power because they can.

All this is why I still think it is entirely possible that, even though it looks like talks with the SSPX have completely fallen apart, the Pope might still do something unilaterally to recognize the traditional order. You see, when it comes to resistance to NuChurch, there is no greater real threat than the SSPX. Under the current circumstances, the Vatican Machinery can exercise very little control over them. That cannot sit well with them. They have pulled the bait and switch on the SSPX twice now, bringing them to the edge of reconciliation only to try and have them sell their souls on the Vatican II altar. They have failed both times.
The SSPX did not cave like NuChurchers do.

So now something new is required. They want some control over the SSPX so that they can crush opposition. They very well may come to the conclusion that the only path to control is to grant recognition without much pre-condition in hopes that they will not want to lose what they have. Don’t be surprised if this happens. In the end, it is all about politics in NuChurch and politics is about power, and power unused is power lost.

Catch Patrick's regular column in The Remnant's Print/-E-edition!

 

 

[Comment Guidelines]
The Remnant values the comments and input of our visitors. It’s no secret, however, that trolls exist, and trolls can do a lot of damage to a brand. Therefore, our comments are heavily monitored 24/7 by Remnant moderators around the country.  They have been instructed to remove demeaning, hostile, needlessly combative, racist, Christophobic comments, and streams not related to the storyline. Multiple comments from one person under a story are also discouraged. Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).
The Remnant comments sections are not designed for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters. Please understand that we pay our writers to defend The Remnant’s editorial positions. We thus acknowledge no moral obligation whatsoever to allow anyone and everyone to try to undermine our editorial policy and create a general nuisance on our website.  Therefore, Remnant moderators reserve the right to edit or remove comments, and comments do not necessarily represent the views of The Remnant.
Read 9350 times Last modified on Wednesday, July 27, 2016
Patrick Archbold

Patrick Archbold is co-founder of Creative Minority Report and a Catholic writer on the intersection of religion, culture, and politics. When not writing, Patrick is director of information technology at a large international logistics company. Patrick, his wife Terri, and their five children reside in Long Island, N.Y.

Support The Remnant Newspaper icon close x