Editor’s Note: The following
article was written by my father, Walter L. Matt, in the
December 31, 1969 issue of The Remnant. In it, my father (now
retired) provides us with his reaction to the “Ottaviani
Intervention” when it was first released. We reproduce this
present article for two reasons: First, to demonstrate how
Catholic journalists reacted to the Ottaviani Intervention at
the time when it came out and, secondly, to provide a brief
sampling of the rhetoric against the New Mass that was taken up
almost immediately by loyal Catholics like my father, even as
early as 1969. MJM
Regarding the new Mass Ordo, which was discussed only briefly in
our last issue, Pope Paul tells us in one of his latest addresses on
the subject (See Remnant, Dec. 15, p. 5-A) that the thing for
"intelligent persons and conscientious faithful" to do in order to
face up to the new Ordo is, in his words, "we should find out as
much as we can about this innovation," which, again quoting his
words, "will not be hard to do, because of the many fine efforts
being made by the Church and by publishers" who have been and will
continue to treat this important subject.
In line with Pope Paul's recommendation, there- fore, that "we must
(thus) prepare ourselves" for the new Mass rite–which is to be
finalized, first, by the various national bishops' conferences, and
then, presumably, by the Sovereign Pontiff himself some time in
March, 1971—we call attention to at least one of the very "fine
efforts" currently being made by a distinguished Churchman and also
by a respected Catholic publisher to inform the faithful about some
of the more questionable aspects of the new Ordo, even though these
particular efforts are being sadly ignored in most Catholic circles
today. By ignoring them, however, the result is that Pope Paul's
counsel to "find out as much as we can about this innovation", is
actually being thwarted and supposedly mature Catholics are being
kept in the dark about it, which, we are sure, is not the Pope's
intention.
The distinguished Churchman to whom we allude here is His Eminence
Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, prefect emeritus of the Sacred
Congregation for the Faith. The respected Catholic publishing house
to which we refer is that of Mr. Brent Bozell, publisher of the
erudite TRIUMPH magazine, with headquarters in Washington, D. C.
Both Cardinal Ottaviani and TRIUMPH magazine have, in our humble
opinion, rendered an all but unique public service to "intelligent
persons and conscientious faithful" by making known to them—despite
the usual conspiracy of silence that has been launched against
them—certain carefully prepared analyses and critical observations
about the new Ordo by competent theological/liturgical experts,
beginning with Cardinal Ottaviani himself.
The Cardinal's critique of the new Ordo was in the form of a letter,
dated Sept. 25, 1969, which he sent to Pope Paul together with a
pertinent theological study of the new rite by a group of Roman
theologians. Both the letter as well as the comprehensive study of
the new Ordo have been, to our knowledge, virtually ignored or
ineptly treated by the press and communications media, including
most segments even of the self-styled conservative press both at
home and elsewhere. TRIUMPH magazine, however, got out a 12-page
Special Supplement earlier this month, carrying the full text of
Cardinal Ottaviani's letter and also the text of the Roman
theologians' study of the Ordo. The Special Supplement, entitled
"The Ottaviani Intervention,” is obtainable from Triumph at 927 15th
St., N. W., Washington, D.C. 20065, at .40 per single copy.
TRIUMPH magazine makes no bones of the fact that its purpose in
reproducing these historic documents and disseminating them as
widely as possible is to "save the Tridentine Mass." Apparently the
editors feel as we do and as Cardinal Ottaviani feels about it,
namely, that the new Ordo, at least until such time as an explicit
ex cathedra papal judgment has been rendered concerning the matter
in its entirety, is still open to question in that it seems to
represent a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the
Mass as it was so concisely formulated in Session XXII of the
Council of Trent. Cardinal Ottaviani calls attention in this
connection to the fact that whenever a new law intended for the good
of the people can be proved, instead, to be harmful, the people have
a right, even a duty, to ask for the abrogation of such a law. More
specifically, the Cardinal asks of the Holy Father that, "at a time
of such painful divisions and ever-increasing perils for the purity
of the Faith and the unity of the Church," that the faithful be not
deprived of "the possibility of continuing to have recourse to the
fruitful integrity of that Missale Romanum of St. Pius V (the now
discarded Mass Missal) which Pope Paul himself has so highly lauded
and which is "so deeply loved and venerated by the whole Catholic
world."
For our part here at The Remnant, and considering the fact that the
Holy Father only recently ordered a two-year delay or postponement
before the new Ordo is to be officially and universally approved and
definitively ratified by the Church, we strongly urge our readers
not only to avail themselves of the above named Special Supplement
put out by TRIUMPH magazine, but, by all means, get behind the move
to "save the Tri- dentine Mass," i.e., the traditional Catholic
Mass, before the two-year postponement mentioned above has run its
course.
After all, Pope Paul himself, as we pointed out in our preceding
issue of The Remnant, has stated publicly that "we have reason
indeed for regret, reason almost for bewilderment,” now that we are
faced with, in his words, "giving up something of priceless worth,"
i.e., the old Tridentine Mass. In the circumstances, it seems to us
not only our right but even our duty to try to save the old Mass
from those who, for whatever reasons, are in fact desacralizing and
despoiling it and thereby risking the integrity of the Catholic
Faith as such!
As the Roman theologians state the case at the conclusion of their
scholarly study of the new Ordo: "Today, division and schism are
officially acknowledged to exist not only outside of but within the
Church. Her unity is not only threatened but already tragically
compromised... To abandon (at such time) a liturgical tradition
which for four centuries was both the sign and the pledge of unity
of worship (and to replace it with another which cannot but be a
sign of division by virtue of the countless liberties implicitly
authorized, and which teems with insinuations or manifest errors
against the integrity of the Catholic religion) is, we feel in
conscience bound to proclaim, an incalculable error."
Indeed, and if it be true, as Msgr. Francesco Spadafora, professor
at the Lateran University is alleged to have written, that this new
Ordo Missae has been "perpetrated we do not know exactly by whom and
why, and against even the wishes of the Sacred Congregation of
Rites, and against an absolute majority of the Bishops,” then surely
the time is at hand for questions to be asked and for specific
answers to be given to these and to other charges that have been
made against the new Ordo.
The fact is that there are many today—ourselves included—who are
literally sick at heart, spiritually, over the new Ordo Missae, and
who simply cannot understand most of the arguments that have been
advanced in its behalf. Our own correspondence, especially with
priests, reflects this mood of spiritual dejection and heartache.
One friend of ours, a well known priest-theologian, writes of the
"new Mass" as "a most painful thing," which "fills me with agony at
the mere thought that I shall have to say it, worse still, that it
is 'in obedience to the Council' that we may have to say it! The
fact is, as I see it, that the Council is being openly disobeyed not
only with regard to the Latin and Gregorian Chant, but also insofar
as that self-same Council insisted, after all, that it was
proceeding in complete consonance with the Council of
Trent—presumably also with Trent's decrees on the Holy Sacrifice! In
any case, I am learning more and more that there are quite a few
other priests who are just as much in agony over the new Mass as I
am, and some are even contemplating getting permission from Rome to
say Mass in one of the Oriental Rites if possible. As for me, this
is turning out to be one of the gravest crises in my life. 'Crisis
of conscience,' as Cardinal Ottaviani used it, is the right
expression indeed! Hence, if you dare, don't hesitate to speak up
about the agony of soul which many of us priests are going through
at present. And please, do pray for us—pray for me!"
Someone has well said that in this as in all such soul-shattering
questions, we must place our trust not only in the Holy Father but
in the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Unerring Truth, who will remain
with the Church till the end of time. Let us reflect on the words of
Holy Scripture, (Luke XI, I 1): "And which of you, if he ask his
father bread, will he give him a stone? Or a fish, will he for a
fish give him a serpent? Or if he shall ask an egg, will he reach
him a scorpion?" If this can be said of any father, can we believe
anything less about him whom we call our Holy Father, the Pope,
Christ's Vicar? My suggestion, then, is that we ask our Holy Father,
the Chief Pastor or Shepherd of souls in all Christendom, to treat
with special pastoral solicitude and care the present wretchedness
of spirit that afflicts so many of the flock and to give heed to
their suppliant plea to save and preserve the old Tridentine Mass,
which is Christ's Most Holy Sacrifice ordained by Him to remain with
us forever!
|